Validation and benchmarks

Ashes version 3.32.0

Verification and validation tests run on 2025-08-27 and completed in 0 d 07:57:43


Aerodynamical reference point eccentricity - more structural nodes

28 of 28 passed

Analytical solution for the root torque of the blade when including the influence of the aerodynamical reference point eccentricity. See detailed description

No eccentricity

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point

7 of 7 passed

Moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point and moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

View full report (pdf)


Aerodynamical reference point eccentricity - Static

28 of 28 passed

Analytical solution for the root torque of the blade when including the influence of the aerodynamical reference point eccentricity. See detailed description

No eccentricity

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point

7 of 7 passed

Moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point and moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

View full report (pdf)


Aerodynamical reference point eccentricity

28 of 28 passed

Analytical solution for the root torque of the blade when including the influence of the aerodynamical reference point eccentricity. See detailed description

No eccentricity

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point

7 of 7 passed

Moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point and moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

View full report (pdf)


BEM - velocity triangle video

64 of 64 passed

Analytical solution for the BEM algorithm with the NREL 5-MW turbine. See detailed description

Steady BEM

16 of 16 passed

Unsteady BEM

16 of 16 passed

Steady BEM - Flexible blades

16 of 16 passed

Unsteady BEM - Flexible blades

16 of 16 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark Bell Cantilever - Static

32 of 32 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by Bell (1987) for a cantilever beam. See detailed description

l = 0.6 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark Bell Cantilever

32 of 32 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by Bell (1987) for a cantilever beam. See detailed description

l = 0.6 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark Bell

32 of 32 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by Bell (1987). See detailed description

Figure 6-6 Euler - linear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 Timoshenko - linear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 Euler - nonlinear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 Timoshenko - nonlinear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 circular Euler - linear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 circular Timoshenko - linear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 circular Euler - nonlinear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 circular Timoshenko - nonlinear

4 of 4 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark Irgens

16 of 16 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by Irgens (1985). See detailed description

Eksempel_1_Kap_19_Irgens - linear

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_1_Kap_19_Irgens - linear - load history file

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_3_Kap_19_Irgens - linear

1 of 1 passed

Eksempel_3_Kap_19_Irgens - linear - load history file

1 of 1 passed

Eksempel_5_Kap_24_Irgens - linear

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_1_Kap_19_Irgens - nonlinear

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_1_Kap_19_Irgens - nonlinear - load history file

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_3_Kap_19_Irgens - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

Eksempel_3_Kap_19_Irgens - nonlinear - load history file

1 of 1 passed

Eksempel_5_Kap_24_Irgens - nonlinear

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark MacNeal Curved Beam

2 of 2 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by MacNeal (1985). See detailed description

In-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

Out-of-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark MacNeal Straight Beam

4 of 4 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by MacNeal (1985). See detailed description

Extension

1 of 1 passed

In-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

Out-of-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

Twist

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark MacNeal Twisted Beam

2 of 2 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by MacNeal (1985). See detailed description

In-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

Out-of-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Blade decay test

12 of 12 passed

Decay test with a blade compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Decay no damping

1 of 1 passed

Decay no damping stiffness x 2

1 of 1 passed

Decay no damping stiffness x 0.5

1 of 1 passed

Mass only

1 of 1 passed

Stiffness only

1 of 1 passed

Mass only 2nd mode

1 of 1 passed

Stiffness only 2nd mode

1 of 1 passed

Rayleigh first mode

1 of 1 passed

Rayleigh second mode

1 of 1 passed

Mass from coefficients

1 of 1 passed

Stiffness from coefficients

1 of 1 passed

Rayleigh from coefficients

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Blade structural offset

8 of 8 passed

Comparison between a simple blade with structural offsets and analytical solutions. See detailed description

Elastic offset

2 of 2 passed

Elastic offset 45 pitch

2 of 2 passed

Mass offset

2 of 2 passed

Mass offset 45 pitch

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Buoyancy test

19 of 19 passed

Comparison between buoyancy loads computed by Ashes and analytical solutions. See detailed description

Draft 20 m

4 of 4 passed

Draft 20 m with waves

5 of 5 passed

Draft 20 m with waves two cylinders

5 of 5 passed

Draft 20 m sine motion

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Buoyancy test static

6 of 6 passed

Comparison between buoyancy loads computed by Ashes and analytical solutions. See detailed description

Draft 21 m

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


Cylindrical blade

40 of 40 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a simple cylindrical blade compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

10 ms

4 of 4 passed

5 ms

4 of 4 passed

10 ms 90 deg

4 of 4 passed

10 ms tilt 5 deg

4 of 4 passed

10 ms cone 2.5 deg

4 of 4 passed

10 ms Loads only

4 of 4 passed

5 ms Loads only

4 of 4 passed

10 ms 90 deg Loads only

4 of 4 passed

10 ms tilt 5 deg Loads only

4 of 4 passed

10 ms cone 2.5 deg Loads only

4 of 4 passed

View full report (pdf)


Decay test tower

20 of 20 passed

Decay test in Ashes compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Decay no damping

2 of 2 passed

Mass only

2 of 2 passed

Stiffness only

2 of 2 passed

Mass only 2nd mode

2 of 2 passed

Stiffness only 2nd mode

2 of 2 passed

Rayleigh first mode

2 of 2 passed

Rayleigh second mode

2 of 2 passed

Mass from coefficients

2 of 2 passed

Stiffness from coefficients

2 of 2 passed

Rayleigh from coefficients

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW blade eigenfrequencies

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the DTU 10-MW blade eigenfrequencies published in the specification document. See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW isolated blade mode shapes

7 of 7 passed

Benchmark against the DTU 10-MW blade eigenfrequencies published in the specification document. See detailed description

1st flap mode

1 of 1 passed

1st edge mode

1 of 1 passed

2nd flap mode

1 of 1 passed

2nd edge mode

1 of 1 passed

3rd flap mode

1 of 1 passed

3rd edge mode

1 of 1 passed

4th flap mode

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW steady state performance - stiff blades

22 of 22 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the DTU 10-MW turbine without prebend, tilt, cone and structural deflections as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

5 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

6 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

7 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

8 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

9 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

10 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

11 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

12 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

13 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

14 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

15 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

16 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

17 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

18 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

19 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

20 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

21 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

22 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

23 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

24 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

25 ms wind speed

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW steady state performance - Timoshenko blades with offsets

110 of 110 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the DTU 10-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

5 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

6 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

7 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

8 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

9 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

10 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

11 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

12 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

13 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

14 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

15 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

16 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

17 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

18 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

19 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

20 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

21 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

22 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

23 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

24 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

25 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW steady state performance - Timoshenko blades

110 of 110 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the DTU 10-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

5 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

6 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

7 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

8 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

9 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

10 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

11 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

12 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

13 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

14 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

15 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

16 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

17 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

18 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

19 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

20 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

21 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

22 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

23 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

24 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

25 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW steady state performance

110 of 110 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the DTU 10-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

5 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

6 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

7 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

8 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

9 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

10 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

11 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

12 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

13 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

14 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

15 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

16 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

17 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

18 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

19 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

20 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

21 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

22 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

23 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

24 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

25 ms wind speed

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW whole turbine eigenfrequencies

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the eigenfrequencies of the DTU 10-MW turbine as published in the spedicifaction document and as computed by Ashes. See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Dynamic stall test

4 of 4 passed

Comparison between output from Ashes and results from Hansen See detailed description

Oye

1 of 1 passed

GK

3 of 3 passed

View full report (pdf)


Eigenfrequency circular cylinder

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the eigenfrequency of a circular cylinder computed by Ashes and the analytical solution. See detailed description

Analytical

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Element weight

9 of 9 passed

Weight of an element with different cross sections compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Circular hollow

1 of 1 passed

Circular shape

1 of 1 passed

Circular shape thickness

1 of 1 passed

Circular shape thickness filling

1 of 1 passed

Circular shape thickness filling half

1 of 1 passed

Circular solid

1 of 1 passed

Rectangular hollow

1 of 1 passed

Rectangular shape

1 of 1 passed

Circular hollow Mars

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Emergency-stop

5 of 5 passed

Default RNA template with a Python pitch controller that picthes the blades 90 degrees after 15 s. See detailed description

Load case 1

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Fatigue test analytical

3 of 3 passed

Fatigue life compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Static pull

1 of 1 passed

Oscillating load

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Fatigue_test_analytical_blade

3 of 3 passed

Fatigue life of a blade compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Static pull

1 of 1 passed

Oscillating load

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Heave plate test

52 of 52 passed

Comparison between hydrodynamic loads on a heave plate computed by Ashes and theory.

H = 5 m T = 10 s

12 of 12 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s surge offset

12 of 12 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s surge-sway offset angle 45

14 of 14 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s surge-sway offset angle -45

14 of 14 passed

View full report (pdf)


Hydro loads on rectangular CS from current

28 of 28 passed

LC1

4 of 4 passed

LC2

4 of 4 passed

LC3

4 of 4 passed

LC4

4 of 4 passed

LC5

4 of 4 passed

LC6

4 of 4 passed

LC7

4 of 4 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA 15-MW blade eigenfrequencies

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the eigenfrequencies of the IEA 15-MW blade as published in the spedicifaction document and as computed by Ashes.

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA 15-MW no blades eigenfrequencies

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the eigenfrequencies of a bladeless IEA 15-MW model from OrcaFlex and as computed by Ashes.

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA 15-MW Rotor Performance

96 of 96 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the IEA 15-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

5 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

6 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

7 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

8 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

9 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

10 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

11 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

12 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

13 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

14 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

15 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

17.5 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

20 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

22.5 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

25 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA 15-MW Rotor Performance with rotational inertia

96 of 96 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the IEA 15-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

5 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

6 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

7 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

8 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

9 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

10 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

11 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

12 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

13 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

14 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

15 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

17.5 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

20 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

22.5 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

25 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA15MW Monopile weight

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the weight of the Monopile for the IEA 15-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA15MW tubular tower weight

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the weight of the tubular tower for the IEA 15-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Iec extremes

12 of 12 passed

IEC extreme wind produced in Ashes compared to the IEC standard. See detailed description

EOG

2 of 2 passed

EOG 25ms

2 of 2 passed

EDC

4 of 4 passed

EDC 25ms

4 of 4 passed

View full report (pdf)


NREL 5MW eigenfrequencies regression

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the eigenfrequencies of the NREL 5-MW reference wind turbine.

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


NREL 5MW eigenfrequencies

2 of 2 passed

Benchmark against the eigenfrequencies of the NREL 5-MW reference wind turbine.

Load case 1

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


MacCamy-Fuchs test

10 of 10 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a circular cylinder in waves using the MacCamy-Fuchs correction compared to benchmark values. See detailed description

L = 60 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 30 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 20 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 15 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 12 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 10 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 8.57 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 7.5 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 6.67 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 6 m

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Maximum stress

2 of 2 passed

Results produced by Ashes for a static pull compared to the analytical solution. See detailed description

Default tower

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Morison test

24 of 24 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a circular cylinder in waves compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

H = 5 m L = 120 m

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m L = 120 m Cm = 2

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m L = 120 m Cd = 1

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m L = 120 m D = 4 m

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s h = 200 m

3 of 3 passed

H = 2 m T = 5 s

3 of 3 passed

H = 2 m T = 5 s h = 10 m

3 of 3 passed

View full report (pdf)


Morison total load

16 of 16 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a circular cylinder in waves compared to a benchmarked solution. See detailed description

H = 5 m T = 7 s

2 of 2 passed

H = 10 m T = 12 s

2 of 2 passed

H = 5 m T = 7 s fixed

2 of 2 passed

H = 10 m T = 12 s fixed

2 of 2 passed

H = 5 m T = 7 s partly

2 of 2 passed

H = 10 m T = 12 s partly

2 of 2 passed

H = 5 m T = 7 s moving

2 of 2 passed

H = 10 m T = 12 s moving

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


nonlinear rotational spring test

18 of 18 passed

Displacement of a node experiencing a force and attached to a nonlinear spring. See detailed description

x-direction 60 MNm

2 of 2 passed

x-direction -30 MNm

2 of 2 passed

y-direction 4 MNm

2 of 2 passed

y-direction -2 MNm

2 of 2 passed

z-direction 1 MNm

2 of 2 passed

z-direction -0.5 MNm

2 of 2 passed

xy-direction

4 of 4 passed

x-direction sine

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


nonlinear spring test

18 of 18 passed

Displacement of a node experiencing a force and attached to a nonlinear spring. See detailed description

x-direction 1000 N

2 of 2 passed

x-direction -200 N

2 of 2 passed

y-direction 1000 N

2 of 2 passed

y-direction -300 N

2 of 2 passed

z-direction 500 N

2 of 2 passed

z-direction -1000 N

2 of 2 passed

xy-direction

4 of 4 passed

x-direction sine

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I

507 of 507 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

507 of 507 passed

2.1b

0 of 0 passed

2.4

0 of 0 passed

3.1

0 of 0 passed

4.1

0 of 0 passed

5.1

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_DLL

507 of 507 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

507 of 507 passed

2.1b

0 of 0 passed

2.4

0 of 0 passed

3.1

0 of 0 passed

4.1

0 of 0 passed

5.1

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_python

507 of 507 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

507 of 507 passed

2.1b

0 of 0 passed

2.4

0 of 0 passed

3.1

0 of 0 passed

4.1

0 of 0 passed

5.1

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC12

13 of 13 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

13 of 13 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC12 regression

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC26

494 of 494 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.6

494 of 494 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC43

494 of 494 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

4.3

494 of 494 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_II

294 of 294 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II See detailed description

4.1a

294 of 294 passed

4.1b

0 of 0 passed

4.1c

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3 Phase II LC 12 AF

6 of 6 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3 Phase II LC 12 AF regression

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3 Phase II LC 12 DS

5 of 5 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3 Phase II LC 12 DS regression

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_I_LC10b

13 of 13 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase I Load case 1.0 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

13 of 13 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC12

408 of 408 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase II See detailed description

1.2

408 of 408 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13b13c

504 of 504 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase II See detailed description

1.3b

504 of 504 passed

1.3c

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13a13d

528 of 528 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase II See detailed description

1.3a

528 of 528 passed

1.3d

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13b13c_PF

504 of 504 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase II See detailed description

1.3b

504 of 504 passed

1.3c

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13a13d_PF

528 of 528 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase II See detailed description

1.3a

528 of 528 passed

1.3d

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC1

100 of 100 passed

Benchmark against the OC6 Phase I See detailed description

LC11

100 of 100 passed

LC12

0 of 0 passed

LC13

0 of 0 passed

LC14

0 of 0 passed

LC15

0 of 0 passed

LC16

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC1_speed

11 of 11 passed

Benchmark against the OC6 Phase I See detailed description

LC11

1 of 1 passed

LC12

2 of 2 passed

LC13

2 of 2 passed

LC14

2 of 2 passed

LC15

2 of 2 passed

LC16

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC2

132 of 132 passed

Benchmark against the OC6 Phase I See detailed description

LC21

132 of 132 passed

LC22

0 of 0 passed

LC23

0 of 0 passed

LC24

0 of 0 passed

LC25

0 of 0 passed

LC26

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC2_analytical

72 of 72 passed

Benchmark against the OC6 Phase I See detailed description

LC21

12 of 12 passed

LC22

12 of 12 passed

LC23

12 of 12 passed

LC24

12 of 12 passed

LC25

12 of 12 passed

LC26

12 of 12 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC3

96 of 96 passed

Benchmark against the OC6 Phase I See detailed description

LC31

96 of 96 passed

LC32

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


One airfoil blade fixed

20 of 20 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a simple blade compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Stiff blade

5 of 5 passed

two-element blade

5 of 5 passed

three-element blade

5 of 5 passed

20-element blade

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


One airfoil blade

162 of 162 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a simple blade compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

10 ms

9 of 9 passed

5 ms

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10

9 of 9 passed

10 ms - unsteady BEM

9 of 9 passed

5 ms - unsteady BEM

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 - unsteady BEM

9 of 9 passed

10 ms pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

5 ms pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

10 ms - unsteady BEM pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

5 ms - unsteady BEM pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 - unsteady BEM pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

10 ms twist

9 of 9 passed

5 ms twist

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 twist

9 of 9 passed

10 ms - unsteady BEM twist

9 of 9 passed

5 ms - unsteady BEM twist

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 - unsteady BEM twist

9 of 9 passed

View full report (pdf)


OpenPile Benchmark

26 of 26 passed

Load case 1

26 of 26 passed

View full report (pdf)


Potential Flow OpenFAST Loads

10 of 10 passed

Comparison of aerodynamic loads for yawed inflow conditions with OpenFAST. See detailed description

LC11

5 of 5 passed

LC21

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Potential flow oscillation

126 of 126 passed

Floater in no waves and forced oscillations. See detailed description

x1

21 of 21 passed

x2

21 of 21 passed

y1

21 of 21 passed

y2

21 of 21 passed

z1

21 of 21 passed

z2

21 of 21 passed

View full report (pdf)


Potential Flow Wave excitation

50 of 50 passed

Fixed floater in regular waves. See detailed description

10s 3m 0deg

10 of 10 passed

5s 2m 0deg

10 of 10 passed

10s 5m 50deg

10 of 10 passed

10s -7s 5m -3m 50deg - -30deg

10 of 10 passed

full_spectrum

10 of 10 passed

View full report (pdf)


Quadratic generator test

8 of 8 passed

Results produced by Ashes compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

RPM 2

2 of 2 passed

RPM 10

2 of 2 passed

RPM 20

2 of 2 passed

K 05

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Spring test

36 of 36 passed

Displacement of a node experiencing a force and attached to a linear spring. See detailed description

Translational x-direction

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction negative force

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction negative force

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction negative force

1 of 1 passed

Translational xyz-direction

3 of 3 passed

Rotational x-direction

1 of 1 passed

Rotational y-direction

1 of 1 passed

Rotational z-direction

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction negative force linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction negative force linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction negative force linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational xyz-direction linear

3 of 3 passed

Rotational x-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Rotational y-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Rotational z-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction negative force 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction negative force 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction negative force 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational xyz-direction 6x6

3 of 3 passed

Rotational x-direction 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Rotational y-direction 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Rotational z-direction 6x6

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Static pull

62 of 62 passed

Static pull compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction

4 of 4 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the y-direction

4 of 4 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force at 45 degrees

7 of 7 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the z-direction

3 of 3 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a moment around the z-direction

2 of 2 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction - 20 m element

4 of 4 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the z-direction - 20 m element

3 of 3 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a moment around the z-direction - 20 m element

2 of 2 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction - Timoshenko

4 of 4 passed

Rectangular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction

4 of 4 passed

Rectangular hollow cross section with a force in the y-direction

4 of 4 passed

Rectangular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction 90 deg twist

4 of 4 passed

Rectangular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction 30 deg twist

7 of 7 passed

Circular shape cross section with a force in the x-direction

3 of 3 passed

Circular shape cross section with a force in the y-direction

3 of 3 passed

Circular shape cross section with a force in the z-direction

2 of 2 passed

Circular shape cross section with a moment around the z-direction

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 10 H = 10 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 10 H = 10 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 10 H = 5 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 10 H = 5 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 10 H = 8 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 10 H = 8 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 5 H = 2 d = 20 N = 5

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 5 H = 2 d = 20 N = 5

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 5 H = 5 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 5 H = 5 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function

1 of 1 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from Peeringa . See detailed description

Test 1 Peeringa

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Timoshenko Blade

8 of 8 passed

Static pull of a blade compared to Bell (1987) for Euler-Beryesulli and Timoshenko elements. See detailed description

l = 0.6 EB

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tower shadow

4 of 4 passed

Verification of the wind velocity deficit produced by the tower shadow with the potential flow model. See detailed description

No shadow

2 of 2 passed

Tower shadow

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tower shadow Powles

12 of 12 passed

Verification of the wind velocity deficit produced by the tower shadow with the Powles model. See detailed description

No shadow

3 of 3 passed

Tower shadow

3 of 3 passed

Tower shadow cd = 0.67

3 of 3 passed

Tower shadow azimuth 5 deg

3 of 3 passed

View full report (pdf)


VAWT De Tavernier benchmark

4 of 4 passed

Results from Ashes compared to De Taverneir 2022. See detailed description

Default

4 of 4 passed

View full report (pdf)


Wave kinematic test

768 of 768 passed

Wave kinematics from Ashes against analytical solution. See detailed description

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = 0 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 3 T = 10 theta = 0 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 3 T = 6 theta = 0 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = 0 ph = 90

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = 90 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = 45 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = -10 ph = 0

89 of 89 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = 90 ph = 0 spectrum

97 of 97 passed

View full report (pdf)


Yawed inflow

90 of 90 passed

Comparison of aerodynamic loads for yawed inflow conditions with OpenFAST. See detailed description

3ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

4ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

5ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

6ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

7ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

8ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

9ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

10ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

11ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

12ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

13ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

14ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

15ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

16ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

17ms0deg

1 of 1 passed

3ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

4ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

5ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

6ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

7ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

8ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

9ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

10ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

11ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

12ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

13ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

14ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

15ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

16ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

17ms10deg

1 of 1 passed

3ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

4ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

5ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

6ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

7ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

8ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

9ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

10ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

11ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

12ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

13ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

14ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

15ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

16ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

17ms20deg

1 of 1 passed

3ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

4ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

5ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

6ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

7ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

8ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

9ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

10ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

11ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

12ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

13ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

14ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

15ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

16ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

17ms30deg

1 of 1 passed

3ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

4ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

5ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

6ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

7ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

8ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

9ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

10ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

11ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

12ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

13ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

14ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

15ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

16ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

17ms40deg

1 of 1 passed

3ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

4ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

5ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

6ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

7ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

8ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

9ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

10ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

11ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

12ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

13ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

14ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

15ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

16ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

17ms50deg

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Aerodynamics

768 of 768 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Tip and Hub loss

64 of 64 passed

Excluded stations at tip and Glauert

64 of 64 passed

Tower shadow

64 of 64 passed

Moving structure

64 of 64 passed

Drag on tower

64 of 64 passed

Steady BEM

64 of 64 passed

Incoming wind for induction

64 of 64 passed

Polar interpolation scheme

64 of 64 passed

Apply moments

64 of 64 passed

Shear Eccentricity moments

64 of 64 passed

Mass centers offset

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Analysis_Convergence

256 of 256 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Load case 2

64 of 64 passed

Load case 3

64 of 64 passed

Load case 4

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Analysis_General

951 of 951 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Loads only

61 of 61 passed

Time step RPM

64 of 64 passed

Time step TSR

64 of 64 passed

Stiff blades

61 of 61 passed

Analysis mode

64 of 64 passed

HHT factor

64 of 64 passed

Newmark Beta

64 of 64 passed

Newmark Beta coeffs

64 of 64 passed

Timoshenko

64 of 64 passed

Lumped mass

64 of 64 passed

Solver acceleration

64 of 64 passed

Consisten mass matrix

64 of 64 passed

Inertia factor

64 of 64 passed

Stiff CM

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Analysis_Loads_ramp-up

384 of 384 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Time steps

64 of 64 passed

Curve linear

64 of 64 passed

Curve exponential

64 of 64 passed

Scheme duration

64 of 64 passed

None

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Analysis_Misc

192 of 192 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Statisctics start time

64 of 64 passed

Realtime scheme

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Analysis_One_prescribed_load

448 of 448 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Force

64 of 64 passed

Force periodic

64 of 64 passed

Force disabled

64 of 64 passed

Moment

64 of 64 passed

Moment periodic

64 of 64 passed

Moment disabled

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Analysis_Special_events

192 of 192 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Torque

64 of 64 passed

Torque time

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Analysis_Static

192 of 192 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

static loads increment

64 of 64 passed

Mass scale factor

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Atmosphere

448 of 448 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Defined air density

64 of 64 passed

Density from parameters

64 of 64 passed

Defined viscosity

64 of 64 passed

Viscosity from parameters

64 of 64 passed

User defined atm pressure

64 of 64 passed

Pressure from parameters

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Decay

320 of 320 passed

A decay test for the NREL 5-MW turbine in operation

2 ms

64 of 64 passed

6 ms

64 of 64 passed

10 ms

64 of 64 passed

14 ms

64 of 64 passed

18 ms

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Decay2

317 of 317 passed

A decay test for the NREL 5 MW turbine in operation

22 ms

64 of 64 passed

26 ms

64 of 64 passed

30 ms

64 of 64 passed

locked shaft_flex blades

64 of 64 passed

locked shaft_stiff blades

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default floater

74 of 74 passed

Load case 1

74 of 74 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default Offshore

66 of 66 passed

Load case 1

66 of 66 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default Onshore

64 of 64 passed

One minute simulation of default 5MW turbine with 10 m/s constant uniform wind. The results are compared with a previous version of Ashes.

Uniform wind - 10ms

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default RNA only

64 of 64 passed

One minute simulation of RNA only with 10 m/s constant uniform wind. The results are compared with a previous version of Ashes.

Load case 1 test

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default pendulum

55 of 55 passed

30 sec pendulum simulation

Load case 1

55 of 55 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default RNA only with one blade

64 of 64 passed

30 sec RNA only with one blade simulation

Load case 1

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default tubular tower only

26 of 26 passed

30 sec tubular tower only simulation

Load case 1

26 of 26 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default offshore truss tower

66 of 66 passed

30 sec defalut offshore truss tower simulation with joint sensors

Load case 1

66 of 66 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default Monopile only

26 of 26 passed

30 sec Monopile only simulation

Load case 1

26 of 26 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default VAWT

20 of 20 passed

30 sec default VAWT simulation

Load case 1

20 of 20 passed

View full report (pdf)


Environment

128 of 128 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Change gravity

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Hub

576 of 576 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Radius

64 of 64 passed

Mass cheme

64 of 64 passed

Mass

64 of 64 passed

Inertia

64 of 64 passed

EI

64 of 64 passed

AE

64 of 64 passed

GJ

64 of 64 passed

m

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Induction Generator

280 of 280 passed

Synchronous scheme

56 of 56 passed

Synchronous speed

56 of 56 passed

Grid frequency

56 of 56 passed

Poles

56 of 56 passed

Rated slip

56 of 56 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_regression

1824 of 1824 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

304 of 304 passed

2.1b

304 of 304 passed

2.4

304 of 304 passed

3.1

304 of 304 passed

4.1

304 of 304 passed

5.1

304 of 304 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_DLL_regression

1824 of 1824 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

304 of 304 passed

2.1b

304 of 304 passed

2.4

304 of 304 passed

3.1

304 of 304 passed

4.1

304 of 304 passed

5.1

304 of 304 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_python_regression

1824 of 1824 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

304 of 304 passed

2.1b

304 of 304 passed

2.4

304 of 304 passed

3.1

304 of 304 passed

4.1

304 of 304 passed

5.1

304 of 304 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC26_regression

304 of 304 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.6

304 of 304 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC43_regression

304 of 304 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

4.3

304 of 304 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_II_regression

1035 of 1035 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II See detailed description

4.1a

373 of 373 passed

4.1b

289 of 289 passed

4.1c

373 of 373 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13b13c_regression

528 of 528 passed

1.3b

264 of 264 passed

1.3c

264 of 264 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13a13d_regression

528 of 528 passed

1.3a

264 of 264 passed

1.3d

264 of 264 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13b13c_PF_regression

528 of 528 passed

1.3b

264 of 264 passed

1.3c

264 of 264 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13a13d_PF_regression

528 of 528 passed

1.3a

264 of 264 passed

1.3d

264 of 264 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC3_regression

4 of 4 passed

LC31

2 of 2 passed

LC32

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Onshore_Sensors

157 of 157 passed

Load case 1

157 of 157 passed

View full report (pdf)


Pendulum

220 of 220 passed

Free motion damped 90 deg

55 of 55 passed

Free motion damped 60 deg

55 of 55 passed

Free motion damped 30 deg

55 of 55 passed

Free motion damped 0 deg

55 of 55 passed

View full report (pdf)


PID Controller Generator

40 of 40 passed

Default

8 of 8 passed

Setpoint

8 of 8 passed

KP

8 of 8 passed

KI

8 of 8 passed

KD

8 of 8 passed

View full report (pdf)


PID Controller Pitch

576 of 576 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Maximum pitch

64 of 64 passed

Minimum pitch

64 of 64 passed

Maximum pitch rate

64 of 64 passed

KP

64 of 64 passed

KI

64 of 64 passed

KD

64 of 64 passed

Gain scheduling

64 of 64 passed

Pitch angle param

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


PMSG Radial Generator

1008 of 1008 passed

Default

56 of 56 passed

Resistance in wire

56 of 56 passed

Number of turns per coil

56 of 56 passed

Active length of coil side

56 of 56 passed

Winding factor

56 of 56 passed

Correction factor term

56 of 56 passed

Correction factor temp

56 of 56 passed

poles

56 of 56 passed

Flux density

56 of 56 passed

DistMin

56 of 56 passed

DistPole

56 of 56 passed

Number of phases

56 of 56 passed

Length correction factor

56 of 56 passed

Load res per phase

56 of 56 passed

Ref number of turns per coil

56 of 56 passed

Stator soil ind per phase

56 of 56 passed

ref RPM for loss

56 of 56 passed

Friction and vent loss

56 of 56 passed

View full report (pdf)


PythonLoads

24 of 24 passed

Runs two sims with Morison loads computed with Python

Load case 1

12 of 12 passed

Load case 2

12 of 12 passed

View full report (pdf)


Rotor

960 of 960 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Blade type

64 of 64 passed

Cone

64 of 64 passed

Pitch rotational inertia

64 of 64 passed

Pitch actuator mode

64 of 64 passed

Ref actuator torque

64 of 64 passed

KP

64 of 64 passed

KI

64 of 64 passed

KD

64 of 64 passed

Reduction factor for structural data

64 of 64 passed

Structural scale factor

64 of 64 passed

Torsional Inertia factor

64 of 64 passed

Target Cp

64 of 64 passed

Target RPM

64 of 64 passed

Target cut-in RPM

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


RNA

790 of 790 passed

Load case 1

64 of 64 passed

Load case 2

64 of 64 passed

Load case 3

47 of 47 passed

Load case 4

56 of 56 passed

Load case 5

56 of 56 passed

Load case 6

64 of 64 passed

Load case 7

64 of 64 passed

Load case 8

64 of 64 passed

Load case 9

55 of 55 passed

Load case 10

64 of 64 passed

Load case 11

64 of 64 passed

Load case 12

64 of 64 passed

Load case 13

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


StepWise_wind

64 of 64 passed

Load case 1

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Timoshenko_test

52 of 52 passed

Load case 1

26 of 26 passed

Load case 2

26 of 26 passed

View full report (pdf)


TurbSim benchmark

140 of 140 passed

Benchmark between Ashes and the summary file from TurbSim See detailed description

Turb1

20 of 20 passed

Turb2

20 of 20 passed

Turb3

20 of 20 passed

Turb4

20 of 20 passed

Turb5

20 of 20 passed

Turb6

20 of 20 passed

Turb7

20 of 20 passed

View full report (pdf)


TurbSim wind parameters

1152 of 1152 passed

Load case 1

64 of 64 passed

Load case 2

64 of 64 passed

Load case 3

64 of 64 passed

Load case 4

64 of 64 passed

Load case 5

64 of 64 passed

Load case 6

64 of 64 passed

Load case 7

64 of 64 passed

Load case 8

64 of 64 passed

Load case 9

64 of 64 passed

Load case 10

64 of 64 passed

Load case 11

64 of 64 passed

Load case 12

64 of 64 passed

Load case 13

64 of 64 passed

Load case 14

64 of 64 passed

Load case 15

64 of 64 passed

Load case 16

64 of 64 passed

Load case 17

64 of 64 passed

Load case 18

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Variable speed generator

1024 of 1024 passed

Default

64 of 64 passed

Maximum Generator Torque

64 of 64 passed

Minimum time to rated torque

64 of 64 passed

Proportionality factor region 2

64 of 64 passed

Transition RPM region 1 to 1.5

64 of 64 passed

Transition RPM region 1.5 to 2

64 of 64 passed

Transition RPM region 2.5 to 3

64 of 64 passed

Slip

64 of 64 passed

Rated power scheme

64 of 64 passed

Target wind speed

64 of 64 passed

Rated electrical power

64 of 64 passed

Rated RPM

64 of 64 passed

Efficiency factor

64 of 64 passed

Drivetrain efficiency factor

64 of 64 passed

Filtering

64 of 64 passed

Corner frequency

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


VAWT De Tavernier benchmark

29 of 29 passed

Default

29 of 29 passed

View full report (pdf)


Wind IEC

640 of 640 passed

EOG def

64 of 64 passed

EOG start

64 of 64 passed

EOG ref wind

64 of 64 passed

ECD

64 of 64 passed

EDC

64 of 64 passed

EWM

64 of 64 passed

EWM ramp-up

64 of 64 passed

EWM recurrence

64 of 64 passed

EWSH

64 of 64 passed

EWSV

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Wind Turbine

256 of 256 passed

Def

64 of 64 passed

Global scaling

64 of 64 passed

Local scaling - parent

64 of 64 passed

Local scaling - override

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Wind Uniform

448 of 448 passed

def

64 of 64 passed

wind speed

64 of 64 passed

initial angle

64 of 64 passed

shear

64 of 64 passed

power loaw exponent

64 of 64 passed

reference height scheme

64 of 64 passed

reference height

64 of 64 passed

View full report (pdf)


Aero moments on vs off

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


NREL 5-MW vs ROSCO

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


DTU simple controller vs ROSCO

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


NREL 5-MW vs Ashes Python controller

Visual check

Ashes vs ROSCO

View full report (pdf)


Compare Python input

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


Euler_number_of_element_comparison

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


Pendulum

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


Timoshenko_comparison

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


Morison vs PF

Visual check

View full report (pdf)