Validation and benchmarks

Ashes version 3.28.1

Verification and validation tests run on 2024-10-30 and completed in 0 d 09:24:44


Aerodynamical reference point eccentricity - more structural nodes

28 of 28 passed

Analytical solution for the root torque of the blade when including the influence of the aerodynamical reference point eccentricity. See detailed description

No eccentricity

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point

7 of 7 passed

Moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point and moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

View full report (pdf)


Aerodynamical reference point eccentricity - Static

28 of 28 passed

Analytical solution for the root torque of the blade when including the influence of the aerodynamical reference point eccentricity. See detailed description

No eccentricity

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point

7 of 7 passed

Moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point and moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

View full report (pdf)


Aerodynamical reference point eccentricity

28 of 28 passed

Analytical solution for the root torque of the blade when including the influence of the aerodynamical reference point eccentricity. See detailed description

No eccentricity

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point

7 of 7 passed

Moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

Aerodynamical reference point and moment coefficient

7 of 7 passed

View full report (pdf)


BEM - velocity triangle video

64 of 64 passed

Analytical solution for the BEM algorithm with the NREL 5-MW turbine. See detailed description

Steady BEM

16 of 16 passed

Unsteady BEM

16 of 16 passed

Steady BEM - Flexible blades

16 of 16 passed

Unsteady BEM - Flexible blades

16 of 16 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark Bell Cantilever - Static

32 of 32 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by Bell (1987) for a cantilever beam. See detailed description

l = 0.6 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark Bell Cantilever

32 of 32 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by Bell (1987) for a cantilever beam. See detailed description

l = 0.6 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T circular - linear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T circular - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark Bell

32 of 32 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by Bell (1987). See detailed description

Figure 6-6 Euler - linear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 Timoshenko - linear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 Euler - nonlinear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 Timoshenko - nonlinear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 circular Euler - linear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 circular Timoshenko - linear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 circular Euler - nonlinear

4 of 4 passed

Figure 6-6 circular Timoshenko - nonlinear

4 of 4 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark Irgens

16 of 16 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by Irgens (1985). See detailed description

Eksempel_1_Kap_19_Irgens - linear

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_1_Kap_19_Irgens - linear - load history file

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_3_Kap_19_Irgens - linear

1 of 1 passed

Eksempel_3_Kap_19_Irgens - linear - load history file

1 of 1 passed

Eksempel_5_Kap_24_Irgens - linear

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_1_Kap_19_Irgens - nonlinear

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_1_Kap_19_Irgens - nonlinear - load history file

2 of 2 passed

Eksempel_3_Kap_19_Irgens - nonlinear

1 of 1 passed

Eksempel_3_Kap_19_Irgens - nonlinear - load history file

1 of 1 passed

Eksempel_5_Kap_24_Irgens - nonlinear

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark MacNeal Curved Beam

2 of 2 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by MacNeal (1985). See detailed description

In-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

Out-of-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark MacNeal Straight Beam

4 of 4 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by MacNeal (1985). See detailed description

Extension

1 of 1 passed

In-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

Out-of-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

Twist

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Benchmark MacNeal Twisted Beam

2 of 2 passed

Comparison between results produced by Ashes and results published by MacNeal (1985). See detailed description

In-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

Out-of-plane shear

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Blade decay test

12 of 12 passed

Decay test with a blade compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Decay no damping

1 of 1 passed

Decay no damping stiffness x 2

1 of 1 passed

Decay no damping stiffness x 0.5

1 of 1 passed

Mass only

1 of 1 passed

Stiffness only

1 of 1 passed

Mass only 2nd mode

1 of 1 passed

Stiffness only 2nd mode

1 of 1 passed

Rayleigh first mode

1 of 1 passed

Rayleigh second mode

1 of 1 passed

Mass from coefficients

1 of 1 passed

Stiffness from coefficients

1 of 1 passed

Rayleigh from coefficients

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Blade structural offset

8 of 8 passed

Comparison between a simple blade with structural offsets and analytical solutions. See detailed description

Elastic offset

2 of 2 passed

Elastic offset 45 pitch

2 of 2 passed

Mass offset

2 of 2 passed

Mass offset 45 pitch

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Buoyancy test

14 of 14 passed

Comparison between buoyancy loads computed by Ashes and analytical solutions. See detailed description

Draft 20 m

4 of 4 passed

Draft 20 m with waves

5 of 5 passed

Draft 20 m with waves two cylinders

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Buoyancy test static

6 of 6 passed

Comparison between buoyancy loads computed by Ashes and analytical solutions. See detailed description

Draft 21 m

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


Cylindrical blade

40 of 40 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a simple cylindrical blade compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

10 ms

4 of 4 passed

5 ms

4 of 4 passed

10 ms 90 deg

4 of 4 passed

10 ms tilt 5 deg

4 of 4 passed

10 ms cone 2.5 deg

4 of 4 passed

10 ms Loads only

4 of 4 passed

5 ms Loads only

4 of 4 passed

10 ms 90 deg Loads only

4 of 4 passed

10 ms tilt 5 deg Loads only

4 of 4 passed

10 ms cone 2.5 deg Loads only

4 of 4 passed

View full report (pdf)


Decay test tower

20 of 20 passed

Decay test in Ashes compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Decay no damping

2 of 2 passed

Mass only

2 of 2 passed

Stiffness only

2 of 2 passed

Mass only 2nd mode

2 of 2 passed

Stiffness only 2nd mode

2 of 2 passed

Rayleigh first mode

2 of 2 passed

Rayleigh second mode

2 of 2 passed

Mass from coefficients

2 of 2 passed

Stiffness from coefficients

2 of 2 passed

Rayleigh from coefficients

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW blade eigenfrequencies

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the DTU 10-MW blade eigenfrequencies published in the specification document. See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW isolated blade mode shapes

7 of 7 passed

Benchmark against the DTU 10-MW blade eigenfrequencies published in the specification document. See detailed description

1st flap mode

1 of 1 passed

1st edge mode

1 of 1 passed

2nd flap mode

1 of 1 passed

2nd edge mode

1 of 1 passed

3rd flap mode

1 of 1 passed

3rd edge mode

1 of 1 passed

4th flap mode

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW steady state performance - stiff blades

44 of 44 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the DTU 10-MW turbine without prebend, tilt, cone and structural deflections as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

5 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

6 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

7 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

8 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

9 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

10 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

11 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

12 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

13 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

14 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

15 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

16 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

17 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

18 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

19 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

20 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

21 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

22 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

23 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

24 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

25 ms wind speed

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW steady state performance - Timoshenko blades with offsets

132 of 132 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the DTU 10-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

5 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

6 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

7 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

8 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

9 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

10 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

11 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

12 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

13 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

14 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

15 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

16 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

17 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

18 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

19 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

20 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

21 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

22 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

23 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

24 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

25 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW steady state performance - Timoshenko blades

132 of 132 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the DTU 10-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

5 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

6 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

7 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

8 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

9 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

10 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

11 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

12 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

13 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

14 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

15 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

16 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

17 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

18 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

19 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

20 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

21 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

22 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

23 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

24 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

25 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW steady state performance

132 of 132 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the DTU 10-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

5 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

6 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

7 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

8 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

9 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

10 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

11 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

12 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

13 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

14 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

15 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

16 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

17 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

18 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

19 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

20 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

21 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

22 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

23 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

24 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

25 ms wind speed

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


DTU 10-MW whole turbine eigenfrequencies

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the eigenfrequencies of the DTU 10-MW turbine as published in the spedicifaction document and as computed by Ashes. See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Dynamic stall test

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between output from Ashes and results from Hansen See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Eigenfrequency circular cylinder

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the eigenfrequency of a circular cylinder computed by Ashes and the analytical solution. See detailed description

Analytical

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Element weight

9 of 9 passed

Weight of an element with different cross sections compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Circular hollow

1 of 1 passed

Circular shape

1 of 1 passed

Circular shape thickness

1 of 1 passed

Circular shape thickness filling

1 of 1 passed

Circular shape thickness filling half

1 of 1 passed

Circular solid

1 of 1 passed

Rectangular hollow

1 of 1 passed

Rectangular shape

1 of 1 passed

Circular hollow Mars

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Emergency-stop

6 of 6 passed

Default RNA template with a Python pitch controller that picthes the blades 90 degrees after 15 s. See detailed description

Load case 1

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


Fatigue test analytical

3 of 3 passed

Fatigue life compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Static pull

1 of 1 passed

Oscillating load

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Heave plate test

10 of 10 passed

Comparison between hydrodynamic loads on a heave plate computed by Ashes and theory.

H = 5 m T = 10 s

2 of 2 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s surge offset

2 of 2 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s surge-sway offset angle 45

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s surge-sway offset angle -45

3 of 3 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA 15-MW blade eigenfrequencies

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the eigenfrequencies of the IEA 15-MW blade as published in the spedicifaction document and as computed by Ashes.

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA 15-MW no blades eigenfrequencies

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the eigenfrequencies of a bladeless IEA 15-MW model from OrcaFlex and as computed by Ashes.

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA 15-MW Rotor Performance

112 of 112 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the IEA 15-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

5 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

6 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

7 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

8 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

9 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

10 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

11 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

12 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

13 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

14 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

15 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

17.5 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

20 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

22.5 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

25 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA 15-MW Rotor Performance with rotational inertia

112 of 112 passed

Comparison between aerodynamic performance of the IEA 15-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

4 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

5 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

6 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

7 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

8 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

9 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

10 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

11 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

12 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

13 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

14 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

15 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

17.5 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

20 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

22.5 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

25 ms wind speed

7 of 7 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA15MW Monopile weight

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the weight of the Monopile for the IEA 15-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


IEA15MW tubular tower weight

1 of 1 passed

Comparison between the weight of the tubular tower for the IEA 15-MW turbine as published in the specification document and Ashes See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Iec extremes

12 of 12 passed

IEC extreme wind produced in Ashes compared to the IEC standard. See detailed description

EOG

2 of 2 passed

EOG 25ms

2 of 2 passed

EDC

4 of 4 passed

EDC 25ms

4 of 4 passed

View full report (pdf)


NREL 5MW eigenfrequencies regression

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the eigenfrequencies of the NREL 5-MW reference wind turbine.

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


NREL 5MW eigenfrequencies

2 of 2 passed

Benchmark against the eigenfrequencies of the NREL 5-MW reference wind turbine.

Load case 1

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


MacCamy-Fuchs test

10 of 10 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a circular cylinder in waves using the MacCamy-Fuchs correction compared to benchmark values. See detailed description

L = 60 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 30 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 20 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 15 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 12 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 10 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 8.57 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 7.5 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 6.67 m

1 of 1 passed

L = 6 m

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Maximum stress

2 of 2 passed

Results produced by Ashes for a static pull compared to the analytical solution. See detailed description

Default tower

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Morison test

24 of 24 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a circular cylinder in waves compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

H = 5 m L = 120 m

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m L = 120 m Cm = 2

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m L = 120 m Cd = 1

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m L = 120 m D = 4 m

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s

3 of 3 passed

H = 5 m T = 10 s h = 200 m

3 of 3 passed

H = 2 m T = 5 s

3 of 3 passed

H = 2 m T = 5 s h = 10 m

3 of 3 passed

View full report (pdf)


Morison total load

8 of 8 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a circular cylinder in waves compared to a benchmarked solution. See detailed description

H = 5 m T = 7 s

1 of 1 passed

H = 10 m T = 12 s

1 of 1 passed

H = 5 m T = 7 s fixed

1 of 1 passed

H = 10 m T = 12 s fixed

1 of 1 passed

H = 5 m T = 7 s partly

1 of 1 passed

H = 10 m T = 12 s partly

1 of 1 passed

H = 5 m T = 7 s moving

1 of 1 passed

H = 10 m T = 12 s moving

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


nonlinear rotational spring test

18 of 18 passed

Displacement of a node experiencing a force and attached to a nonlinear spring. See detailed description

x-direction 60 MNm

2 of 2 passed

x-direction -30 MNm

2 of 2 passed

y-direction 4 MNm

2 of 2 passed

y-direction -2 MNm

2 of 2 passed

z-direction 1 MNm

2 of 2 passed

z-direction -0.5 MNm

2 of 2 passed

xy-direction

4 of 4 passed

x-direction sine

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


nonlinear spring test

18 of 18 passed

Displacement of a node experiencing a force and attached to a nonlinear spring. See detailed description

x-direction 1000 N

2 of 2 passed

x-direction -200 N

2 of 2 passed

y-direction 1000 N

2 of 2 passed

y-direction -300 N

2 of 2 passed

z-direction 500 N

2 of 2 passed

z-direction -1000 N

2 of 2 passed

xy-direction

4 of 4 passed

x-direction sine

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I

520 of 520 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

520 of 520 passed

2.1b

0 of 0 passed

2.4

0 of 0 passed

3.1

0 of 0 passed

4.1

0 of 0 passed

5.1

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_DLL

520 of 520 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

520 of 520 passed

2.1b

0 of 0 passed

2.4

0 of 0 passed

3.1

0 of 0 passed

4.1

0 of 0 passed

5.1

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_python

520 of 520 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

520 of 520 passed

2.1b

0 of 0 passed

2.4

0 of 0 passed

3.1

0 of 0 passed

4.1

0 of 0 passed

5.1

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC12

13 of 13 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

13 of 13 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC12 regression

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC26

507 of 507 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.6

507 of 507 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC43

507 of 507 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

4.3

507 of 507 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_II

300 of 300 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II See detailed description

4.1a

300 of 300 passed

4.1b

0 of 0 passed

4.1c

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3 Phase II LC 12 AF

6 of 6 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

6 of 6 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3 Phase II LC 12 AF regression

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3 Phase II LC 12 DS

5 of 5 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3 Phase II LC 12 DS regression

1 of 1 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II Load case 1.2 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_I_LC10b

13 of 13 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase I Load case 1.0 (eigenfrequencies) See detailed description

Load case 1

13 of 13 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13b13c

504 of 504 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase II See detailed description

1.3b

504 of 504 passed

1.3c

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13a13d

528 of 528 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase II See detailed description

1.3a

528 of 528 passed

1.3d

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13b13c_PF

504 of 504 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase II See detailed description

1.3b

504 of 504 passed

1.3c

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13a13d_PF

528 of 528 passed

Benchmark against the OC4 Phase II See detailed description

1.3a

528 of 528 passed

1.3d

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC1

100 of 100 passed

Benchmark against the OC6 Phase I See detailed description

LC11

100 of 100 passed

LC12

0 of 0 passed

LC13

0 of 0 passed

LC14

0 of 0 passed

LC15

0 of 0 passed

LC16

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC1_speed

11 of 11 passed

Benchmark against the OC6 Phase I See detailed description

LC11

1 of 1 passed

LC12

2 of 2 passed

LC13

2 of 2 passed

LC14

2 of 2 passed

LC15

2 of 2 passed

LC16

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC3

96 of 96 passed

Benchmark against the OC6 Phase I See detailed description

LC31

96 of 96 passed

LC32

0 of 0 passed

View full report (pdf)


One airfoil blade fixed

20 of 20 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a simple blade compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Stiff blade

5 of 5 passed

two-element blade

5 of 5 passed

three-element blade

5 of 5 passed

20-element blade

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


One airfoil blade

162 of 162 passed

Results produced by Ashes with a simple blade compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

10 ms

9 of 9 passed

5 ms

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10

9 of 9 passed

10 ms - unsteady BEM

9 of 9 passed

5 ms - unsteady BEM

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 - unsteady BEM

9 of 9 passed

10 ms pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

5 ms pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

10 ms - unsteady BEM pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

5 ms - unsteady BEM pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 - unsteady BEM pitch 20

9 of 9 passed

10 ms twist

9 of 9 passed

5 ms twist

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 twist

9 of 9 passed

10 ms - unsteady BEM twist

9 of 9 passed

5 ms - unsteady BEM twist

9 of 9 passed

10 ms RPM 10 - unsteady BEM twist

9 of 9 passed

View full report (pdf)


Potential Flow OpenFAST Loads

4 of 4 passed

LC11

2 of 2 passed

LC21

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Quadratic generator test

8 of 8 passed

RPM 2

2 of 2 passed

RPM 10

2 of 2 passed

RPM 20

2 of 2 passed

K 05

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Spring test

33 of 33 passed

Displacement of a node experiencing a force and attached to a linear spring. See detailed description

Translational x-direction

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction negative force

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction negative force

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction negative force

1 of 1 passed

Translational xyz-direction

3 of 3 passed

Rotational x-direction

1 of 1 passed

Rotational y-direction

1 of 1 passed

Rotational z-direction

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction negative force linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction negative force linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction negative force linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational xyz-direction linear

3 of 3 passed

Rotational x-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Rotational y-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Rotational z-direction linear

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational x-direction negative force 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational y-direction negative force 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational z-direction negative force 6x6

1 of 1 passed

Translational xyz-direction 6x6

3 of 3 passed

View full report (pdf)


Static pull

62 of 62 passed

Static pull compared to analytical solution. See detailed description

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction

4 of 4 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the y-direction

4 of 4 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force at 45 degrees

7 of 7 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the z-direction

3 of 3 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a moment around the z-direction

2 of 2 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction - 20 m element

4 of 4 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the z-direction - 20 m element

3 of 3 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a moment around the z-direction - 20 m element

2 of 2 passed

Circular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction - Timoshenko

4 of 4 passed

Rectangular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction

4 of 4 passed

Rectangular hollow cross section with a force in the y-direction

4 of 4 passed

Rectangular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction 90 deg twist

4 of 4 passed

Rectangular hollow cross section with a force in the x-direction 30 deg twist

7 of 7 passed

Circular shape cross section with a force in the x-direction

3 of 3 passed

Circular shape cross section with a force in the y-direction

3 of 3 passed

Circular shape cross section with a force in the z-direction

2 of 2 passed

Circular shape cross section with a moment around the z-direction

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 10 H = 10 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 10 H = 10 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 10 H = 5 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 10 H = 5 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 10 H = 8 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 10 H = 8 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 5 H = 2 d = 20 N = 5

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 5 H = 2 d = 20 N = 5

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function T = 5 H = 5 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from obtained with Fenton's code . See detailed description

T = 5 H = 5 d = 20 N = 11

5 of 5 passed

View full report (pdf)


Stream function

1 of 1 passed

Stream function wave kinematics compared to results from Peeringa . See detailed description

Test 1 Peeringa

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Timoshenko Blade

8 of 8 passed

Static pull of a blade compared to Bell (1987) for Euler-Beryesulli and Timoshenko elements. See detailed description

l = 0.6 EB

1 of 1 passed

l = 0.6 T

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 EB

1 of 1 passed

l = 1.5 T

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 EB

1 of 1 passed

l = 3 T

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 EB

1 of 1 passed

l = 6 T

1 of 1 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tower shadow

4 of 4 passed

Verification of the wind velocity deficit produced by the tower shadow with the potential flow model. See detailed description

No shadow

2 of 2 passed

Tower shadow

2 of 2 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tower shadow Powles

12 of 12 passed

Verification of the wind velocity deficit produced by the tower shadow with the Powles model. See detailed description

No shadow

3 of 3 passed

Tower shadow

3 of 3 passed

Tower shadow cd = 0.67

3 of 3 passed

Tower shadow azimuth 5 deg

3 of 3 passed

View full report (pdf)


VAWT De Tavernier benchmark

4 of 4 passed

Default

4 of 4 passed

View full report (pdf)


Wave kinematic test

679 of 679 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = 0 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 3 T = 10 theta = 0 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 3 T = 6 theta = 0 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = 0 ph = 90

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = 90 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = 45 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

d = 20 m H = 6 T = 10 theta = -10 ph = 0

97 of 97 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tests the parameters from Aerodynamics tab

732 of 732 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Tip and Hub loss

61 of 61 passed

Excluded stations at tip and Glauert

61 of 61 passed

Tower shadow

61 of 61 passed

Moving structure

61 of 61 passed

Drag on tower

61 of 61 passed

Steady BEM

61 of 61 passed

Incoming wind for induction

61 of 61 passed

Polar interpolation scheme

61 of 61 passed

Apply moments

61 of 61 passed

Shear Eccentricity moments

61 of 61 passed

Mass centers offset

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tests the parameters from Analysis_Convergence tab

244 of 244 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Load case 2

61 of 61 passed

Load case 3

61 of 61 passed

Load case 4

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tests the parameters from Analysis_General tab

906 of 906 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Loads only

58 of 58 passed

Time step RPM

61 of 61 passed

Time step TSR

61 of 61 passed

Stiff blades

58 of 58 passed

Analysis mode

61 of 61 passed

HHT factor

61 of 61 passed

Newmark Beta

61 of 61 passed

Newmark Beta coeffs

61 of 61 passed

Timoshenko

61 of 61 passed

Lumped mass

61 of 61 passed

Solver acceleration

61 of 61 passed

Consisten mass matrix

61 of 61 passed

Inertia factor

61 of 61 passed

Stiff CM

58 of 58 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tests the parameters from Analysis_Loads_Ramp_up tab

366 of 366 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Time steps

61 of 61 passed

Curve linear

61 of 61 passed

Curve exponential

61 of 61 passed

Scheme duration

61 of 61 passed

None

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tests the parameters from Analysis_Misc tab

183 of 183 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Statisctics start time

61 of 61 passed

Realtime scheme

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tests the parameters from Analysis_One_prescribed_load tab

427 of 427 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Force

61 of 61 passed

Force periodic

61 of 61 passed

Force disabled

61 of 61 passed

Moment

61 of 61 passed

Moment periodic

61 of 61 passed

Moment disabled

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tests the parameters from Analysis_Special_events tab

183 of 183 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Torque

61 of 61 passed

Torque time

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tests the parameters from Analysis_Static tab

183 of 183 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

static loads increment

61 of 61 passed

Mass scale factor

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Tests the parameters of the Atmosphere part

427 of 427 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Defined air density

61 of 61 passed

Density from parameters

61 of 61 passed

Defined viscosity

61 of 61 passed

Viscosity from parameters

61 of 61 passed

User defined atm pressure

61 of 61 passed

Pressure from parameters

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Decay test

305 of 305 passed

A decay test for the NREL 5-MW turbine in operation

2 ms

61 of 61 passed

6 ms

61 of 61 passed

10 ms

61 of 61 passed

14 ms

61 of 61 passed

18 ms

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Decay test2

302 of 302 passed

A decay test for the NREL 5 MW turbine in operation

22 ms

61 of 61 passed

26 ms

61 of 61 passed

30 ms

61 of 61 passed

locked shaft_flex blades

61 of 61 passed

locked shaft_stiff blades

58 of 58 passed

View full report (pdf)


default floater

70 of 70 passed

Load case 1

70 of 70 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default offshore with turbulent wind

63 of 63 passed

Load case 1

63 of 63 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default onshore

61 of 61 passed

One minute simulation of default 5MW turbine with 10 m/s constant uniform wind. The results are compared with a previous version of Ashes.

Uniform wind - 10ms

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


default rna only

61 of 61 passed

One minute simulation of RNA only with 10 m/s constant uniform wind. The results are compared with a previous version of Ashes.

Load case 1 test

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


default pendulum

55 of 55 passed

30 sec pendulum simulation

Load case 1

55 of 55 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default RNA only with one blade

61 of 61 passed

30 sec RNA only with one blade simulation

Load case 1

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default tubular tower only

26 of 26 passed

30 sec tubular tower only simulation

Load case 1

26 of 26 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default offshore truss tower

63 of 63 passed

30 sec defalut offshore truss tower simulation with joint sensors

Load case 1

63 of 63 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default Monopile only

26 of 26 passed

30 sec Monopile only simulation

Load case 1

26 of 26 passed

View full report (pdf)


Default VAWT

20 of 20 passed

30 sec default VAWT simulation

Load case 1

20 of 20 passed

View full report (pdf)


Test the parameters of the Environment part

122 of 122 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Change gravity

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Hub parameters

549 of 549 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Radius

61 of 61 passed

Mass cheme

61 of 61 passed

Mass

61 of 61 passed

Inertia

61 of 61 passed

EI

61 of 61 passed

AE

61 of 61 passed

GJ

61 of 61 passed

m

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Induction Generator

265 of 265 passed

Synchronous scheme

53 of 53 passed

Synchronous speed

53 of 53 passed

Grid frequency

53 of 53 passed

Poles

53 of 53 passed

Rated slip

53 of 53 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_regression

1806 of 1806 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

301 of 301 passed

2.1b

301 of 301 passed

2.4

301 of 301 passed

3.1

301 of 301 passed

4.1

301 of 301 passed

5.1

301 of 301 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_DLL_regression

1806 of 1806 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

301 of 301 passed

2.1b

301 of 301 passed

2.4

301 of 301 passed

3.1

301 of 301 passed

4.1

301 of 301 passed

5.1

301 of 301 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_python_regression

1806 of 1806 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.1a

301 of 301 passed

2.1b

301 of 301 passed

2.4

301 of 301 passed

3.1

301 of 301 passed

4.1

301 of 301 passed

5.1

301 of 301 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC26_regression

301 of 301 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

2.6

301 of 301 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_I_LC43_regression

301 of 301 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase I See detailed description

4.3

301 of 301 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC3_Phase_II_regression

1026 of 1026 passed

Benchmark against the OC3 Phase II See detailed description

4.1a

370 of 370 passed

4.1b

286 of 286 passed

4.1c

370 of 370 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13b13c_regression

564 of 564 passed

1.3b

282 of 282 passed

1.3c

282 of 282 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13a13d_regression

564 of 564 passed

1.3a

282 of 282 passed

1.3d

282 of 282 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13b13c_PF_regression

564 of 564 passed

1.3b

282 of 282 passed

1.3c

282 of 282 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC4_Phase_II_LC13a13d_PF_regression

564 of 564 passed

1.3a

282 of 282 passed

1.3d

282 of 282 passed

View full report (pdf)


OC6_Phase_I_LC3_regression

20 of 20 passed

LC31

10 of 10 passed

LC32

10 of 10 passed

View full report (pdf)


A test with several sensors on the tower

154 of 154 passed

Load case 1

154 of 154 passed

View full report (pdf)


Pendulum tests

220 of 220 passed

Free motion damped 90 deg

55 of 55 passed

Free motion damped 60 deg

55 of 55 passed

Free motion damped 30 deg

55 of 55 passed

Free motion damped 0 deg

55 of 55 passed

View full report (pdf)


PID controller Generator

40 of 40 passed

Default

8 of 8 passed

Setpoint

8 of 8 passed

KP

8 of 8 passed

KI

8 of 8 passed

KD

8 of 8 passed

View full report (pdf)


PID controller Pitch

549 of 549 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Maximum pitch

61 of 61 passed

Minimum pitch

61 of 61 passed

Maximum pitch rate

61 of 61 passed

KP

61 of 61 passed

KI

61 of 61 passed

KD

61 of 61 passed

Gain scheduling

61 of 61 passed

Pitch angle param

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


PMSG Radial Generator

954 of 954 passed

Default

53 of 53 passed

Resistance in wire

53 of 53 passed

Number of turns per coil

53 of 53 passed

Active length of coil side

53 of 53 passed

Winding factor

53 of 53 passed

Correction factor term

53 of 53 passed

Correction factor temp

53 of 53 passed

poles

53 of 53 passed

Flux density

53 of 53 passed

DistMin

53 of 53 passed

DistPole

53 of 53 passed

Number of phases

53 of 53 passed

Length correction factor

53 of 53 passed

Load res per phase

53 of 53 passed

Ref number of turns per coil

53 of 53 passed

Stator soil ind per phase

53 of 53 passed

ref RPM for loss

53 of 53 passed

Friction and vent loss

53 of 53 passed

View full report (pdf)


PythonLoads

16 of 16 passed

Runs two sims with Morison loads computed with Python

Load case 1

8 of 8 passed

Load case 2

8 of 8 passed

View full report (pdf)


Rotor parameters

915 of 915 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Blade type

61 of 61 passed

Cone

61 of 61 passed

Pitch rotational inertia

61 of 61 passed

Pitch actuator mode

61 of 61 passed

Ref actuator torque

61 of 61 passed

KP

61 of 61 passed

KI

61 of 61 passed

KD

61 of 61 passed

Reduction factor for structural data

61 of 61 passed

Structural scale factor

61 of 61 passed

Torsional Inertia factor

61 of 61 passed

Target Cp

61 of 61 passed

Target RPM

61 of 61 passed

Target cut-in RPM

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


A stepwise wind from 3 to 25 with 60 sec steps

61 of 61 passed

Load case 1

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Timoshenko

52 of 52 passed

Load case 1

26 of 26 passed

Load case 2

26 of 26 passed

View full report (pdf)


Variable speed generator

976 of 976 passed

Default

61 of 61 passed

Maximum Generator Torque

61 of 61 passed

Minimum time to rated torque

61 of 61 passed

Proportionality factor region 2

61 of 61 passed

Transition RPM region 1 to 1.5

61 of 61 passed

Transition RPM region 1.5 to 2

61 of 61 passed

Transition RPM region 2.5 to 3

61 of 61 passed

Slip

61 of 61 passed

Rated power scheme

61 of 61 passed

Target wind speed

61 of 61 passed

Rated electrical power

61 of 61 passed

Rated RPM

61 of 61 passed

Efficiency factor

61 of 61 passed

Drivetrain efficiency factor

61 of 61 passed

Filtering

61 of 61 passed

Corner frequency

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


VAWT De Tavernier benchmark regression

29 of 29 passed

Default

29 of 29 passed

View full report (pdf)


Test the parameters of the Wind IEC part

610 of 610 passed

EOG def

61 of 61 passed

EOG start

61 of 61 passed

EOG ref wind

61 of 61 passed

ECD

61 of 61 passed

EDC

61 of 61 passed

EWM

61 of 61 passed

EWM ramp-up

61 of 61 passed

EWM recurrence

61 of 61 passed

EWSH

61 of 61 passed

EWSV

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Test the parameters of the Wind turbine part

244 of 244 passed

Def

61 of 61 passed

Global scaling

61 of 61 passed

Local scaling - parent

61 of 61 passed

Local scaling - override

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Test the parameters of the Wind Uniform part

427 of 427 passed

def

61 of 61 passed

wind speed

61 of 61 passed

initial angle

61 of 61 passed

shear

61 of 61 passed

power loaw exponent

61 of 61 passed

reference height scheme

61 of 61 passed

reference height

61 of 61 passed

View full report (pdf)


Aero moments on vs off

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


NREL 5-MW vs ROSCO

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


DTU simple controller vs ROSCO

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


NREL 5-MW vs Ashes Python controller

Visual check

Ashes vs ROSCO

View full report (pdf)


Compare Python input

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


Euler beams with different number of elements

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


Pendulum tests

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


Timoshenko vs Euler

Visual check

View full report (pdf)


Morison vs PF

Visual check

View full report (pdf)